ÿþWe as readers find hat for the summer ourselves wondering less from the way this book is training us to think and more because of how the common conflicts in our lives have trained us about jealousy. And indeed, Kraus writes, "Why does Sylvère entertain this?" Some reasons are offered: because he loves Chris and she is suddenly alive, because he himself is bored, avoiding other work, enjoying the collaboration.

The hysteria he shares with Chris is its own intellectual and emotional project, one separate from Dick. "They take turns giving DICK-tation. Everything is hilarious, power radiates from their mouths and fingertips and the world stands still." The hysteria is Sylvère's as much as Chris's. And without his participation, without men's hat for summer having him to share it with, I wonder whether Chris's infatuation would reach the heights it ultimately reaches.

Dick in the pilot, too, differs from his text-based counterpart. He's much more prominent in the show, and I suspect will continue mens hat types to be. For one thing, he is played by Kevin Bacon, a perfect choice for the portrayal of the inaccessible cowboy. We also have scenes of him alone, signaling that he'll perhaps be a character in his own right, and not one seen solely through Chris's lens.

In the book, on the other hand, Chris's idea that Dick has proposed some sort of game between them seems very much in her mind, an extension of her increasing ushanka hat infatuation, though Dick himself remains oblivious and uninvolved, no longer physically present at this stage. For Dick in the show it seems the game may very well be something real between him and Chris, something which doesn't involve Sylvère.

This, in turn, causes a steady rise in the proportion of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) devoted to health care.THE REAL PROBLEM. But there is a real problem related to the differential rate of productivity increase in health care, and hence the higher rate of medical inflation. As a society, America can clearly afford unrationed health care, because the per person share of GDP increases in a way that outpaces increasing costs. But what about those whose income is increasing at a below-average rate or is not increasing at all? Such individuals will white hat indeed find health care cost increases more and more unaffordable.

But what about those who are not sharing in the benefits of the general increase in productivity? The non-tax, non-rationing way to deal with the need to provide adequate health care for those whose incomes are not sharing in the general productivity increases is to rely on a phenomenon known as private "cost-shifting." As shown below, allowing those who wish to add some of their own funds in order to get the health care plan they want helps make "cost-shifting" possible and thus helps protect poor older Americans from rationing, too.